Petitioner's writ petition seeking withdrawal to file a fresh one was allowed. The original writ petition and connected miscellaneous application were dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition and connected CM application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
LA VITA SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajan Khosla, Adv.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Standing Counsel with Ms. Anju Gupta, Adv. for SDMC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 19.03.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition
to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars. The writ petition and CM
10548/2018 are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MARCH 19, 2018 /aky
LA VITA SERVICES PVT LTD
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
