claims to have made a Representation ( Annexure P-32 ) on 9th January, 2017 against the recoveries sought to be effected upon his reversion. Vide Communication of 15th February, 2017 ( Annexure P-33 ), fourth respondent had directed respondent- Delhi Public Library to put petitioner’s reversion on hold as his representation for promotion was under consideration. The fourth respondent vide its Communication in June, 2011 ( Annexure P-9 ) had clarified to respondent- Delhi Public Library that fourth respondent has no objection to upgradation of post from Hindi Officer to Assistant Director. Respondent- Delhi Public Library vide its order of 30th January, 2012 ( Annexure P-11 ) had converted the post of Hindi Officer to that of Assistant Director (Rajya Bhasa) and as per recommendation of 6th Pay Commission, the pay band of Hindi Officer was increased to the pay band of Assistant Director. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that now recovery from petitioner’s salary is sought to be made which is more than 30% and the said recovery is without any basis, as petitioner had worked on the post of Assistant Director and for no fault of his, petitioner is being deprived of regular promotion to the post of Assistant Director and the consequential revision of pay scale.
