Remanded

Naveen Malhotra v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC10 Feb 2017TR.P.(CRL.)/77/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposes of multiple transfer petitions filed by Naveen Malhotra for transfer of pending criminal complaints from Saket Court to a different court where related trial is pending. Based on a prior order, the court directed transfer.

What did the court decide?

Complaint cases to be dealt with by the Court in terms of the order dated 09.01.2017; pending applications disposed of.

Naveen Malhotra Vs State & Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

Signature Not Verified Signing Date:05.10.2024 17:15:06 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.

¶2

Mr.Shubham Saket, Advocate for R2.

¶3

TR.P.(CRL.)80/2016& CRL.M.A.No.16228/16

¶4

	NAVEEN MALH	OTRA Through: versus	Petitioner Mr.O.P.Gulabani,Advocatewith Mr.Surinder Anand & Mr.Maroof Ahmed, Advocates.
	STATE &ANR	Through :	Respondents Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma, APP. Mr.Kundan K.Mishra, Advocate with Mr.Shubham Saket, Advocate for R2.
+	TR.P.(CRL.)81/2	016& CRL	.M.A.No.16230/16
	NAVEEN MALH	OTRA	Petitioner
	STATE & ANR	Through: versus Through :	Mr.O.P.Gulabani,Advocatewith Mr.Surinder Anand & Mr.Maroof Ahmed, Advocates. Respondents Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma, APP. Mr.Kundan K.Mishra, Advocate with Mr.Shubham Saket, Advocate for R2.
AND
+	TR.P.(CRL.) 82/	2016 &CRL.	M.A.N0.16239/16
	NAVEEN MALH	OTRA	Petitioner
	STATE &ANR	Through : versus Through :	Mr.O.P.Gulabani, Advocate with Mr.Surinder Anand & Mr.Maroof Ahmed, Advocates. Respondents Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma, APP. Mr.Kundan K.Mishra, Advocate with
			Mr.Shubham Saket, Advocate for R2.

¶5

TR.P.(CRL.) 76/2016 & connected matters

¶6

page 2 of 3

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

ORDER

J / t

10.02.2017

The petitionerhas preferredthe presenttransferpetitionsunder Section 407 Cr.P.C. for transfer of CC Nos.51311/16, 51460/16, 54448/16, 51449/16 (Earlier No.829/13), 51310/2016 and 51449/16 (Earlier No.826/13), filed by respondent No.2 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act to the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate,Saket,where trial inFIRNo.485/2014is pending.

¶14

The petitionerhad filed nine transferpetitions. Three of them were listed before the Bench of HMJ Vipin Sanghi. By an order dated 09.01.2017 State case vide FIR No.485/2014 has been ordered to be transferred to the Court where complaint cases are pending. 3. Learned counsel for the parties urged to pass similar order in the present petitions. 4. I have gone throughthe order of the Co-ordinateBench of this Court dated 09.01.2017. Since these transfer petitions are connected with three transferpetitionsdisposedof bythis Courtvide order dated 09.01.2017,with the consent of parties, the complaint cases referred above shall be dealt with by the Court in terms of the said order. 5. Pending applicationsalso stand disposed of.

¶15

ST.GARG, J.

¶16

FEBRUARY 10, 2017/tr

¶17

TR.P,(CRL.) 76/2016& connectedmatters

¶18

page3 of3

Naveen Malhotra v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naveen Malhotra v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sweta Mehrotra Vs the State & Anr.

Anil Gupta & Anr. Vs CBI & Ors.

Dr. a K Sinha Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Vijay Bahadur Rai Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Chima Stanlislux Vs the State (Nct of Delhi)

Suresh Kumar Khera Vs State ( NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Vikas Balguer & Ors. Vs the State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Hkk Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Delhi & Ors.

Kush Parti & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Sh Jitender Khari Vs State

Sharukh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Azad Chaudhary Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Jag Roshan & Anr. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Nishant Arya Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.