Petitioner withdrew criminal revision petition claiming change of presiding judge relieved him of obligations; court recorded prosecution assurance on natural justice and dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24.
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prem Kumar, Deepak Sharma and Rakesh Malhotra, Adv. versus CBI & ORS.
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with Mr. O.P. Verma, DOP for CBI Mr Ravi Sikri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepank Yadav, Adv for R-4&5
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
%
O R D E R 03.02.2017
Mr. Pahwa submits that since the learned Presiding Judge has been changed, he, therefore, does not press this petition.
The Director of Prosecution, CBI has appeared before the court and this court has made know to him the concerns that the proceedings in the present case had thrown up with regard to the manner in which the prosecution of the case was apparently undertaken. He has assured the court that the prosecutors of the CBI shall always act in accordance with law, so that the procedural infirmities as well as breach of principles of natural
justice do not occur in trials involving the CBI.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
FEBRUARY 03, 2017 sr
ANIL GUPTA & ANR.
CBI & ORS.
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition to transfer a criminal case from one court to another.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
