Allowed

Jag Roshan & Anr. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC10 Feb 2017CRL.M.C./557/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of an FIR. Complainant stated matter was settled amicably without pressure. Court quashed FIR considering settlement and trivial nature of dispute, ordering deposit of costs.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.475/2016 and all proceedings therefrom are quashed; petitioners to deposit costs of `10,000 with Prime Minister National Relief Fund.

Jag Roshan & Anr. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

$~56

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 557/2017 & Crl.M.A.2412/2017

¶4

JAG ROSHAN & ANR

¶5

..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Sunil Gautam with Ms.Anju Gautam, Advocates along with petitioners present in person. versus

¶6

STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

¶7

..... Respondents Through : Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghei, APP. Complainant present in person. ASI Jagmohan, PS Jafrabad.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

¶9

O R D E R % 10.02.2017

¶10

(1) Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.475/2016 under Sections 392/34 IPC registered at Police Station Jafrabad. It is stated that the matter has been settled with the complainant/respondent No.2 amicably.

¶11

(2) Respondent No.2-complainant is present before the Court and is identified by the Investigating Officer. I have enquired from the complainant whether the matter has been settled with the petitioners

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

CRL.M.C. 557/2017

¶14

amicably without fear and pressure. She has informed that the matter has been settled without any fear or pressure and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

¶15

(3) The petition is supported by the affidavits of respondent No.2. (4) The parties are acquainted with each other and are neighbourers. The dispute had taken place over a trivial issue. Commission of offence under Section 392 IPC is suspect.

¶16

(5) Since the complainant/Respondent No.2 has voluntarily settled the dispute with the petitioners, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to maintain their neighbourly relations, FIR No.475/2016 under Sections 392/34 IPC registered at Police Station Jafrabad and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶17

(6) The petitioners are, however, burdened with costs of `10,000/to be deposited with Prime Minister National Relief Fund within two weeks. The Registry shall ensure the compliance of the order.

¶18

(7) The petition and all pending application(s) stand disposed of accordingly.

¶19

S.P.GARG, J.

¶20

FEBRUARY 10, 2017/ sa

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

CRL.M.C. 557/2017

Jag Roshan & Anr. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jag Roshan & Anr. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kush Parti & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Sh Jitender Khari Vs State

Sharukh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Azad Chaudhary Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Nishant Arya Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukka Vs State (Nct of Delhi)