Disposed
Suresh v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/257/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
$~50.
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 257/2017
¶4
SURESH ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Divya & Ms.Katyayini, Advocates.
¶6
versus
¶7
STATE ..... Respondent
¶8
Through:
¶9
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
¶10
%
¶11
O R D E R 03.02.2017
¶12
The case has been put up on office note. It is informed that prior to passing of the order dated 27.01.2017 by this Court granting two weeks parole to the petitioner, the State has itself passed an order, whereby four weeks parole has been granted. The clarification is sought whether the parole period should be treated as two weeks or four weeks.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
SURESH
- respondent
STATE
Coram
AI extract
VIPIN SANGHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court