Petitioner complained about allotment of a parking slot. Court noted the site was cancelled and no orders were required. Petition disposed of as infructuous.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous. No substantive orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
NORTH DMC & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SCNorth DMC with Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar and Ms. Anushruti, Advs. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASCGNCTD/R-2 & 3 SI Narpal Singh from Civil Line Traffic Circle & SI Ram Tirath, Pairvi Officer, Traffic
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 01.12.2017
This writ petition filed in public interest made a complaint with regard to allotment of a parking slot at the parallel side wall, Mori Gate, Delhi.
Inasmuch as the respondents have stated that this parking site stand cancelled and is not being allotted for parking any more, no orders are called for in the writ petition.
page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 5873/2017
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
DECEMBER 01, 2017/ kr
page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 5873/2017
RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
NORTH DMC
C.HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
