The High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal and a pending application as withdrawn by the counsel for the appellant. The court noted the impugned order was interim and the final suit decision would remain unaffected.
The appeal and the pending application were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
versus
M/S WORLDWIDE MACHINERY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ANR
..... Respondents
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 10.01.2017
The learned counsel for the appellant has taken instructions with regard to the withdrawal of this appeal. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is obvious that the impugned order is only an interim order and the final decision in the suit will be uninfluenced by the impugned order.
The appeal and the pending application stand dismissed as withdrawn.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
JANUARY 10, 2017/ab
M/s Baliyan Enterprises Pvt Ltd & Anr
M/s Worldwide Machinery Solutions Pvt Ltd & Anr
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
