In an appeal along with a settlement application, the Court allowed the application and disposed of the appeal in terms of the settlement terms mutually entered into by the parties.
Application allowed; appeal disposed of in terms of settlement terms entered into by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~95
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr Vijay Nair with Mr Rahul Malhotra and Mr Tanuj Arora, Advs. for R-1. Mr Anil K. Khaware with Mr Abhinav Mishra, Advs. for R-2, R-3 and R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R % 09.01.2017
CM No.741/2017 in FAO(OS) 129/2016
During the pendency of this appeal, the parties have entered into settlement terms on 29.12.2016, a copy whereof has been placed as Annexure A to CM No.741/2017. The learned counsel for the parties are present. They state that the settlement terms have been voluntarily entered upon by the parties in the present appeal and all the parties have signed the said document.
The learned counsel for the parties request that the present appeal be disposed of in terms of the settlement terms which is Annexure A to CM No.741/2017. Since we see no impediment in issuing such direction, this application is allowed and the appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement between the parties, a copy whereof is Annexure A to CM No.741/2017.
Copy of the order be given dasti under the signature of the Court Master.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
JANUARY 09, 2017/ns
M/S Shree Rathnam Restaurants Pvt Ltd
M/S Sagar Ratna Restaurants Pvt Ltd
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
