The appeal filed by Mool Chand Jain was withdrawn by the counsel in court after liberty to approach the Trial Court was granted for pending applications.
The appeal and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
versus
ASHOK KUMAR GABA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr P.S.Bindra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 10.01.2017
The learned counsel for the appellant states that the liberty has already been granted to the appellant to file an appropriate application before the Trial Court. In view of the same, he is withdrawing this appeal.
The appeal and the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
JANUARY 10, 2017/ab
Mool Chand Jain & Anr
Ashok Kumar Gaba & Anr
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
