The High Court of Delhi dismissal of an application and a writ petition. The court disposed of a criminal M.A. regarding police station summons and, in a separate Writ Petition, declined to press a challenge since the underlying complaint was closed.
Application allowed subject to exceptions; Writ Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
Crl.M.A.219/2017 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application is disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 53/2017
Learned Additional Standing Counsel, on instruction from SI Nitesh Nehra PS Patel Nagar, submits that petitioner was called in the police station during the enquiry conducted on the complaint of Dr. Vikas Jain against petitioner no.1. It is submitted that the complaint has now been closed and presence of petitioners is not required.
In view of this statement, present petition has not been pressed and disposed of as not pressed.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JANUARY 06, 2017/ dk
MOHIT SHARMA & ANR
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
