Mohd Naushad v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a writ petition and a criminal mercy application. The court dismissed the writ petition citing pending SLA before the Supreme Court. The mercy application was exempted from court fees.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed on account of pending SLA; Exemption from court fees allowed in the CRA.
What the court decided
$~6
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 3673/2016 and Crl. MA No. 20104/2016
..... Petitioner
MOHD NAUSHAD ..... Petitioner Through Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv. SI Rajender Singh, PS Special Cell
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 04.01.2017
Crl. MA No. 20104/2016 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The application is disposed of accordingly.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained while the special leave petition is pending before the Supreme Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MOHD NAUSHAD
- respondent
STATE
Coram
A.K. PATHAK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court