admitted in her cross-examination that she has been proceedings in the matter as per the advice received by her from her counsels from time to time. I wonder if her allegations against the applicant were truthful then there was no need for her to engage any counsel much less a large number of counsels. Her conduct during the course of trial has been highly derogatory which includes levelling false allegations against her own previous lawyers, Ld. Addl. PP for the State and the Presiding Officer. It is also evident that she has also sworn a false affidavit before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, in the transfer petition, which is pending disposal wherein she conveniently introduced two false documents claiming the same to be part of trial court record but the same having not been considered by the Trial Judge which is factually incorrect as no such documents are part of trial court record, however I would refrain from commenting on those documents as the matter is sub judice before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. It is also evident that she has introduced characters in her story as per her own convenience. In her evidence she introduced one Ms. Gunjan and alleged that she was forced to delete the video clip by the brother of applicant whereas it has come on record that Ms. Gunjan never had the copy of any such video recording. In the later part of her cross-examination she introduced one Ms. Neha, the beautician, to give explanation to the questions as to why she had been in touch on phone with Sh. Manoj Pant at odd hours.
