Sachin Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application for interim bail under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC, the petitioner sought release to secure school admission for his minor child following his wife's death. The High Court granted interim bail for two weeks subject to exceptions.
What did the court decide?
Released on interim bail for two weeks on personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of the like amount subject to satisfaction of Trial Court.
What the court decided
$~28
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 94/2017
SACHIN KUMAR
..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Pradeep Teotia, Adv.
versus
STATE
..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with Insp. T.R. Meena PS Bhajanpura.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 18.01.2017 Crl.M.A. 937/2017
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 94/2017
Notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted interim bail to apply for admission of his minor child to school considering the death of the petitioner's wife.
Whether the petitioner can obtain such admission through his child's grandmother.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sachin Kumar
- respondent
State
Coram
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court