Pradeep Pandey v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an IPC trial for repeated alleged molestation. The High Court denied bail, finding repeated acts by the petitioner justified dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed.
What the court decided
26# $~
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 79/2017 PRADEEP PANDEY ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate.
| versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| Represented by: | Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Chandan and ASI Maheshwar, PS Okhla |
|
| Industrial Area. | ||
| CORAM: | ||
| HON'BLE MS. | JUSTICE MUKTA | GUPTA |
O R D E R % 17.01.2017
- By the present petition the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 675/2016 under Sections 354/354B/354D/506/509 IPC registered at PS Okhla Industrial Area.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first alleged incident took place on 28th December, 2016, however, no FIR was lodged on 29th December, 2016. Further the version of the prosecutrix is concocted for the reason that she was not walking alone but with her husband and father after closing the shop. Thus there would not be much of a distance between three of them and the petitioner could not have committed the offence.
- The allegations of the prosecutrix in the FIR are that on 28th December, 2016 at about 8.30 PM when she was going towards her jhuggi after purchasing milk, the petitioner caught hold of her hand, tried to press BAIL APPLN. 79/2017 Page 1 of 2
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted given allegations of repeated molestation?
How should the court assess repeated acts of molestation in an anticipatory bail application?
Whether the allegations in the FIR justify denial of anticipatory bail?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PRADIP PANDEY
- respondent
STATE
Coram
MUKTA GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court