The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition. The court noted the respondent's assurance to verify refund amount and pay within two weeks, reserving the outcome of interest claims for separate decision subject to lawful challenge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
Counsel for the respondent states that verification of the refund amount has been made and the amount would be paid within two weeks.
We take the statement on record and dispose of the present writ petition. In case there is a default or delay, it will be open to the petitioner to file an application for revival of the writ petition. We clarify that we have not issued any specific direction or made any observation on the refund or the quantum of refund.
The respondent would also examine the question of interest and communicate their decision to the petitioner. If aggrieved, it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the decision in accordance with law.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
DECEMBER 08, 2017/NA
Saheb Exports
Commissioner of Trade & Taxes
Sanjiv Khanna
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
