No petitioner appeared in the petitioners' respective writ petitions challenging Digital Addressable System implementation. The court found the petitions infructuous and dismissed them in default.
The writ petitions were dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25 & 26
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R % 07.12.2017
In spite of second call, none appears for the petitioner.
As per the respondents, the writ petition has become infructuous as Digital Addressable System (DAS) has already been implemented for PhaseIII and Phase IV.
Dismissed in default.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
DECEMBER 07, 2017 NA
DIGIANA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.
UNION OF INDIA
OM SYSTEMS
UNION OF INDIA
SANJIV KHANNA
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
