The Court disposed of the writ petition accepting the petitioner's admission of partial refund receipt without expressing any opinion on the merits regarding the balance amount of Rs. 2.34 Crores.
Writ petition disposed of without expressing opinion on merits regarding balance refund amount of Rs. 2.34 Crores.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
E I DUPONT INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Mr.Rohan Khare, Advocates.
versus
DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS...... Respondents Through : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R
% 07.12.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that refund of Rs.15.76 Crores has been received. She seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition and states that the petitioner would approach the authorities with regard to balance amount, which is more than Rs. 2.34 Crores.
This statement is made without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner.
In view of the statement made, this writ petition is disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits in respect to Rs.2.34 Crores.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
DECEMBER 07, 2017
j
E I DUPONT INDIA PVT. LTD.
DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
SANJIV KHANNA
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
