Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file individual petitions by petitioners.
Nil; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file individual petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
RAJ KUMAR KHURANA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Ms Meenu Pandey
versus
THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B Mr Pawan Mathur with Ms Akshita Manocha for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R % 16.01.2017
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this
writ petition with liberty to file individual petitions in the name of the petitioners.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
JANUARY 16, 2017 SR
RAJ KUMAR KHURANA & ORS
THE STATE & ORS
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
