The High Court of Delhi disposed of the writ petition by allowing its withdrawal. The petitioners were granted liberty to file individual or grouped petitions according to their family groups.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file individual or grouped petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
..... Petitioners Through : Mr Akhil Sachar with Ms Gayatri Nandwani
YOGENDRA PAL & OTHERS
versus
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak with Mr Sunil Kumar Jha for LAC/L&B/GNCTD Mr Ajay Verma with Mr Vaibhav Mishra for DDA. Mr S. D. Windlesh for Respt.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R
% 16.01.2017
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition was filed prior to the enactment of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. It was jointly filed by several petitioners, some of whom are not related to each other. An application for amendment was filed. But that application was also subsequently withdrawn. The learned counsel now seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file individual petitions/grouping petitions according to their family groups.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
JANUARY 16, 2017 SR
Yogendra Pal & Others
Union of India & Others
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
