Writ petition regarding a contract near its completion date was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner. The court did not examine merits, leaving questions open for future tenders.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
JAIDEEP SINGH ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr Mohinder Madan
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Ms Suparna Srivastava for R-1. Ms Suruchi Suri for R-2. Ms Arvind Mishra with Mr Prince for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R
%
16.01.2017
The learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition any
further on account of the fact that the tenure of the subject contract will be completed on 03.04.2017. We have not examined the merits of the matter.
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed leaving the question open in
case of a future tender.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
JANUARY 16, 2017 SR
Jaidip Singh
Union of India
Another Respondent
Another Respondent
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
