Galaxy Motors v. Commissioner, Trade & Taxes & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of the writ petition regarding a tax refund by directing the petitioner to furnish certified copies of relevant orders within 10 days. The Court clarified that no direction on merits was made, but the petitioner can apply to revive the petition in case of non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
Directing petitioner to furnish self-certified copies of orders and forms to VATO within 10 days; VATO to pass appropriate order within four weeks; liberty to revive petition if non-compliant.
What the court decided
$~13
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 6458/2017
GALAXY MOTORS ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Nitin Gulati, Advocate.
versus
COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR...... Respondents Through : Mr.Avtar Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R
%
07.12.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that the orders rejecting the refund were passed on 10th February, 2012. He, however, points out that fresh orders have not been passed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Galaxy Motors
- respondent
Commissioner, Trade & Taxes
Coram
Sanjiv Khanna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court