The High Court refused to keep the election petition in abeyance. Disposing of the petition, it granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after the election process concludes.
Petition disposed; liberty granted to file fresh petition after conclusion of elections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
AAM AKALI DAL ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Saurabh Chadda, Advocate
versus
DIRECTORATE OF GURUDWARA & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Niti Jain with Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
O R D E R
% 08.02.2017
WP(C) 1145/2017 Page 1 of 3
cancel the nominations, if any, received from the candidates sponsored by the respondents No.2 and 3. Lastly, the petitioner seeks quashing/setting aside the Notification dated 8.11.1999 on the ground that the same is in violation of the provisions of Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (Election of Member) Rule 1974 (in short ‘the Rules’ ).
Page 2 of 3
WP(C) 1145/2017
couple of weeks from now.
HIMA KOHLI, J
FEBRUARY 08, 2017 sk/ap
Page 3 of 3
WP(C) 1145/2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the election petition should remain pending or be disposed of while elections are ongoing.
Whether the Court should grant liberty to file a fresh petition after the conclusion of the elections.
AAM AKALI DAL
DIRECTORATE OF GURUDWARA
HIMA KOHLI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
