The High Court accepted a settlement agreement dated 6.2.2017 arrived at between the petitioner company and ICICI Bank via court mediation. The writ petition was disposed of with parties bearing their own expenses after verifying the agreement's authenticity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
ODEON BUILDER PVT. LTD. & ORS ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Chopra, Advocate
versus
ICICI BANK ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
O R D E R % 07.02.2017
Page 1 of 2
WP(C)898/2017
remaining petitioners as also by the authorized representative of the respondent/Bank and their respective counsels and the learned Mediator. Enclosed with the Settlement Agreement is the extract of the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of the petitioner No.1 authorizing the signatory of the Settlement Agreement to sign the same on its behalf. Similarly, the authority granted by the respondent/Bank in favour of the signatory to the Settlement Agreement has been enclosed therewith.
HIMA KOHLI, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2017 sk
Page 2 of 2
WP(C)898/2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should accept and act upon a settlement agreement arrived at by the parties during the pendency of the writ petition.
Odeon Builder Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
ICICI Bank
Hima Kohli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
