The Division Bench dismissed the applicant's application for condonation of a 977-day delay in re-filing the appeal, attributing the delay to departmental negligence and rejected procedural change arguments.
None. The application for condonation of delay was dismissed, and the underlying appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
versus
BECTON DICKINSON INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 16.03.2016
CM No.9649/2016
CM No.9650/2016 (for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal) & ITA 192/2016
ITA 192/2016 Page 1 of 2
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MARCH 16, 2016 MK
ITA 192/2016 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay in re-filing an appeal can be granted despite inordinate delay attributable to departmental negligence and court procedure changes.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2
BECTON DICKINSON INDIA PVT. LTD.
S. MURALIDHAR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
