The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition challenging an ITAT order regarding the timeline for payment of the first instalment of income tax, subject to specific extensions.
Application allowed subject to extending the time for payment of the first instalment until 21st March, 2016. The petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
M/S RELIGARE CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms Kavita Jha, Advocate.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIOER OF INCOME-TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr P. Roychaudhari, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Ms Lakshmi Gurung, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 15.03.2016
CM 9706/2016
W.P.(C) 2248/2016 & CM 9705/2016 (stay)
of the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) dated 2nd March, 2016 is extended up to 21st March, 2016, the Court is not inclined
to modify or interfere with the said impugned order of the ITAT.
W.P. (C) 2248/2016 Page 1 of 2
S. MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MARCH 15, 2016 pkv
W.P. (C) 2248/2016 Page 2 of 2
M/S RELIGARE CAPITAL MARKETS LTD.
DEPUTY COMMISSIOER OF INCOME-TAX
S. MURALIDHAR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
