The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax for Assessment Year 2010-11, relying on a prior decision ITA No. 280 of 2015 regarding earlier assessment years.
Appeal dismissed; case disposed against the appellant in light of previous decisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-1). ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ashok Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Amin Aziz, Advocate.
versus
LATE SHRI SUDHIR SAREEN (THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Saigal, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 16.03.2016
In view of the decision of this Court dated 6th July 2015 in ITA No. 280 of
2015 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sudhir Sareen) , which pertained to Assessment Years (‘AYs’) 2003-04 to 2008-09, the present appeal which pertains to AY 2010-11 is dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MARCH 16, 2016/mg
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sudhir SareenFollowed¶11
ITA No. 280 of 2015 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sudhir Sareen)
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
Late Shri Sudhir Sareen
S. Muralidhar
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
