The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal as not pressed after one counsel advised withdrawing the appeal while reserving objections for meritorious adjudication.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
M/S MALIK CONSTRUCTIONS ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.S.K.Jain, Adv.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Beenashaw N.Soni, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
%
O R D E R 10.03.2016
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
MARCH 10, 2016 ‘ga’
M/S MALIK CONSTRUCTIONS
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
