The High Court quashed orders by the DRT and DRAT which held that the Limitation Act did not apply to appeals under the Recovery of Debts Act. The court restored the condonation of delay application for disposal on merits.
Writ petition allowed; quashing of DRAT and DRT orders; restoration of IA No.184/2014 for decision on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
SIDDHARTH CHANDRA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Anuradha Hazra, Advocate
versus
BANK OF BARODA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.R.P.Agarwal, Advocate for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.PATHAK
O R D E R
%
09.03.2016
W.P.(C) No.4509/2015
Page 1 of 2
have since been rendered by the Supreme Court. The first is a decision dated July 01, 2015 in CA No.4926/2015 A.R Venugopal vs. Jotheeswaran & Ors . The second is reported as AIR 2015 SC 2881 Baleshwar Dayal Jaiswal vs. Bank of India & Ors.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
A.K.PATHAK, J.
MARCH 09, 2016 mamta
W.P.(C) No.4509/2015
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to appeals under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 where delay in filing appeal needs to be condoned.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
A.R Venugopal vs. Jotheeswaran & OrsFollowed¶17
CA No.4926/2015 A.R Venugopal vs. Jotheeswaran & Ors
Baleshwar Dayal Jaiswal vs. Bank of India & Ors.Followed¶17
AIR 2015 SC 2881 Baleshwar Dayal Jaiswal vs. Bank of India & Ors. · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Siddharth Chandra
Bank of Baroda
Pradeep Nandrajog
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
