Disposed

E.T.I. Projects Limited v. State Bank of India

Delhi HC14 Mar 2016FAO(OS)/8/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Delhi accepted a settlement agreement between appellant and respondent under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Appeal and cross-objections were disposed of based on the settlement terms, directing respondent to pay an agreed sum.

What did the court decide?

Settlement recorded; Appeal and cross-objections disposed of; Respondent to pay Rs. 61,53,000/-; Impugned order modified.

E.T.I. Projects Limited Vs State Bank of India — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~3

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO(OS) 8/2013 and C.M.No.5982/2013

¶4

E.T.I. PROJECTS LIMITED

¶5

..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Mr.Harpreet Singh and Mr.Pranjal Saran, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE BANK OF INDIA

¶8

..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.L.Gupta, Advocate.

¶9

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R 14.03.2016

¶11

C.M.No.9406/2016

¶12

This application has been jointly filed by the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure placing the terms of settlement arrived at between them in paragraph-5 of the application. A prayer is made for recording the terms of the settlement and disposing of the appeal and cross-objections in terms thereof.

¶13

The application is signed by Shri Krishan Kumar Mawai, Director and authorized signatory of the appellant. On behalf of the respondent/crossobjector, the application is signed by the Chief Manager (P & E) for the State Bank of India. Learned counsels for the parties identify the signatures of their respective clients.

¶14

FAO(OS) 8/2013

¶15

page 1 of 3

¶16

A letter dated 9^th March, 2016 sent by Mr.A.K.Sharma, Asst. General Manager (P & E) of State Bank of India to ETI Projects Ltd., stating that the offer for settlement made by the appellant had been favourably considered by the appellant and reiterating the terms and conditions set out in paragraph-5 of the application, has been filed in original as Annexure P-1 to the application.

¶17

The settlement is in writing, appears to be bona fide, entered into without any force, pressure or undue influence and there is no legal impediment for taking the same on record and disposing of the appeal and cross-objections.

¶18

In view of the above, the settlement between the parties is accepted and taken on record. The parties shall be bound by the settlement. This application is allowed.

¶19

The respondent shall file a supporting affidavit to this application in the Registry within two days.

¶20

FAO(OS) 8/2013

¶21

We have today taken on record the settlement between the parties placed by way of CM No.9406/2016. The parties have also jointly prayed that the appeal and cross-objections be disposed of in terms thereof.

¶22

In view of the above, it is directed as follows:-

¶23

(i) The appeal, cross-objections and all other pending applications are disposed of in terms of the settlement set out in para-5 of the application.

¶24

(ii) The respondent shall pay a sum of Rs.61,53,000/- agreed to be paid at the earliest. On receipt of the said amount, all claims of the

¶25

FAO(OS) 8/2013 page 2 of 3

¶26

appellant shall stand satisfied.

¶27

(iii) The cross-objections filed by the respondent are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

(iv) The impugned order dated 1^st October, 2012 shall stand modified to the above extent.

¶29

A copy of this order be given dasti to the Parties.

¶30

GITA MITTAL, J

¶31

I.S.MEHTA, J

¶32

MARCH 14, 2016 ‘dc’

¶33

page 3 of 3

¶34

FAO(OS) 8/2013

E.T.I. Projects Limited v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.T.I. Projects Limited v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeev Sarin Vs Rita Wadhwa & Anr.

Fairwood Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Fairwood Consultants P Ltd) Vs Gujarat International Finance Tec-City Co. Ltd.

Renu Dhawan & Anr. Vs Sudesh Sharma & Ors.

Department of Electronics and Information Technology Vs Star India Private Ltd.

Mustafa Aleem Siddiqi Vs Rasheeda Siddiqi & Anr.

Navayuga Engineering Co. P Ltd. Vs Public Works Department and Anr.

M/S Chennai-Ennore Port Road Co. Ltd. Vs M/S Rds Project Ltd.

M/S Chennai-Ennore Port Road Co. Ltd. Vs M/S Rds Project Ltd.

Angle Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd Vs Ashok Manchanda & Ors.

Ankur Gaur Vs Hani Tiwari

Shikha Vs Rajeev

Dheeraj Dua Vs Meetu Dua & Anr.

Chander Prakash Kayat Vs Sarita

Manish Kumar Vs Annu