This order abated a civil suit due to the expiry of the plaintiff without substitution by legal heirs and vacated an interim order.
Suit abated due to death of plaintiff without substitution; interim order dated 03.07.2015 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
RAJENDRA MOHAN SETHI ..... Plaintiff
Through None.
versus
PARVEEN KUMAR SETHI & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr Rajiv Bahal, Advocate with Mr S.P. Srivastava, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
% 12.07.2016
plaintiff has expired on 31.12.2015 and there is no application for substitution of the plaintiff’s legal heirs, accordingly, the suit is abated.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 12, 2016 pkv
RAJENDRA MOHAN SETHI
PARVEEN KUMAR SETHI
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
