The single-judge division disposed of an application by the petitioner, allowing it subject to just exceptions but as it had become infructuous due to encashment of the bank guarantee, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
Allowed application, subject to just exceptions, then dismissed best petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
BHUSHAN STEEL LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr Salman Khurshid & Mr Anil Airi, Sr Advocates with Ms Azra Rehman, Ms Alisha Panda, Mr Ravi chandana, Ms Sakshi Kotiyal & Mr Aman Madan, Advs. versus GAIL(INDIA) LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr Sachin Puri, Sr Adv with Ms Purnima Maheshwari, Ms Hrshika Pandit and Mr D K Singh, Advs for R1. Mr Kailash Sharma, Adv for R2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
% 11.07.2016 IA 7718/2016
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application is disposed of.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 273/2016
Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner submits that present petition has become infructuous as the Bank Guarantee in question has already been encashed. He seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to agitate the issues before the appropriate forum.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 11, 2016 /M
BHUSHAN STEEL LTD
GAIL(INDIA) LTD
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
