Rahul Bose v. Piyal Bose
Case brief
What is this about?
In I.A. 5317/2016, the plaintiff sought transfer of the suit to District Courts. Relying on a specific notification, the Registrar ordered the transfer and directed parties to appear before the District & Sessions Judge.
What did the court decide?
The application is disposed of by transferring the matter to the Court of Ld. District & Sessions Judge (South-East District), Saket District Courts, Delhi.
What the court decided
$~8
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(OS) 72/2012 RAHUL BOSE
..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Murari Kumar, Adv.
versus PIYAL BOSE ..... Defendant Through: None. CORAM: SH. AMIT KUMAR (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) O R D E R % 13.07.2016
PIYAL BOSE
CORAM:
I.A.No. 5317/2016 filed by plaintiff seeking transfer of the case to District Courts
Defendant through counsel has been duly served. However, none is present for the defendant.
In view of notification no. 27187/DHC/Orgl. Dated 24.11.2015, the present matter stands transferred.
Parties are directed to appear before the Court of Ld. District & Sessions Judge (South-East District), Saket District Courts, Delhi on 16th August, 2016.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Instant application for transfer of case to District Courts should be allowed
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul Bose
- respondent
Piyal Bose
Coram
Amit Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court