Allowed

Umed Singh Khatri & Ors. v. State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Delhi HC7 Apr 2016CRL.M.C./3711/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court quashed the First Information Report on a special plea filed under Section 482 CrPC. The court found that parties had settled the dispute involving offences under the IPC, including cheque bouncing, with free consent. Continuation of proceedings was deemed unnecessary for justice.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 230/2011 under Sections 455/354/323/324/506/509/34 IPC and all proceedings arising therefrom quashed. Petitioners directed to deposit `40,000/- in the Prime Minister Relief Fund.

Umed Singh Khatri & Ors. Vs State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi)… — Money Laundering | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~16

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 3711/2015

¶4

UMED SINGH KHATRI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Avinash Rana & Mr. Kapil Chaudhary, Advocates along with petitioner Nos. 1, 2 & 3. versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP. SI Ashok Kumar, Police Station Dwarka North.

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R

¶6

% 07.04.2016

¶7

It is informed that the petitioner No. 4 Ravinder Kumar @ Rabbu has since expired during the pendency of the case. This fact also finds mention in the status report.

¶8

Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.230/2011 under Sections455/354/323/324/506/ 509/34 IPC at PS Dwarka North. It is stated that the matter has been settled amicably with the complainant/victim/respondent Nos. 2 to 7 vide settlement deed dated 21.08.2015.

¶9

Complainant/victims/respondent Nos. 2 to 7 are present and have been identified by the Investigating Officer. I have enquired from them if they have settled their dispute with the petitioners amicably without any fear or pressure. They have informed that all CRL.M.C. 3711/2015 page 1 of 2

¶10

the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with their free consent and they have no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.

¶11

The petition is supported by affidavits of the parties. Copy of settlement agreement dated 21.08.2015 has been placed on record. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to put an end to the litigation and to maintain their neighbourly relations, FIR No. 230/2011 under Sections455/354/323/324/506/509/34 IPC at PS Dwarka North and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶12

The petitioners are directed to deposit `40,000/- as costs in the Prime Minister Relief Fund within two weeks. Registry shall ensure its compliance.

¶13

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

S.P.GARG, J

APRIL 07, 2016

CRL.M.C. 3711/2015

page 1 of 2

Umed Singh Khatri & Ors. v. State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umed Singh Khatri & Ors. v. State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishore Kumar Vs the State (Nct of Delhi)

Arun Gupta @ Monu Vs State

Jitender Verma Vs State

Mohit @ Monu & Ors. Vs State & Ors.

Kanwar Deep Singh Vs the State

Meenakshee Yadav Vs State & Ors.