The High Court construed the petitionerŌĆÖs offer to pay compensation to a key factor for granting anticipatory bail in a quadruple FIR involving dowry, deception, and criminal breach of trust.
Petitioner granted anticipatory bail, direction to pay `3.5 lacs to complainant within two weeks via Representative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
KANWAR DEEP SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Khalil A.Ansari, Advocate with Mr.Shanawaz Khan, Mohammad Akhtar & Mr.Arif Shakeel, Advocates. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. Mr.Mahavir Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Kanwarpreet Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R D E R % 07.04.2016
BAIL APPLN. 2442/2015
page 1 of 2
3.5 lacs to the complainant without prejudice and subject to future adjustment, he is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required. He shall pay `3.5 lacs to complainant within two weeks through Investigating Officer by way of Demand Draft.S.P.GARG, J
APRIL 07, 2016 / tr
page 2 of 2
BAIL APPLN. 2442/2015
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted subject to payment of compensation to the complainant.
Whether the petitioner is required to join investigation as a condition for bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KANWAR DEEP SINGH
THE STATE
S.P.GARG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court