The petitioner failed to appear for hearing. The State informed that the charge sheet was filed and the petitioner did not appear in the Trial Court. The court concluded the petitioner was not interested in prosecution and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
MEENAKSHEE YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through None versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC along with Ms. Mallika Parmar, Advocate for State. Inpsector Man Mohan, Police Station Sadar Bazar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R
% 07.04.2016
S.P.GARG, J
APRIL 07, 2016 rs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner has not appeared before the Trial Court.
MEENAKSHEE YADAV
STATE & ORS
S.P.GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
