Saroj v. State & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought daughter's production after her voluntary marriage, alleging threat of violence. Daughter volunteered protection for her new family; petitioner not permitted to disturb them. Petition dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Police protection directed to daughter and in-laws for 30 days; petitioner directed not to interfere.
What the court decided
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 3030/2016
SAROJ ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ashok Kotnala, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) and Mr.Tushar Sannu, Adv. for the State along with SI Dinesh Kumar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 08.12.2016
Present petition has been filed by the mother of Kajal seeking her production. On the last date of hearing Kajal was produced in Court. She stated that she has voluntarily married Vishal. Today again she has reiterated her statement. The petitioner, who is present in Court with her daughters Barkha and Puja, submits that they would not like to have any relationship with Kajal and her in laws. Kajal, her husband, mother-in-law and father-in-law are present in Court. They seek police protection as they apprehend violence from the family of Saroj. We direct the concerned SHO, Jahangirpuri, to provide his mobile number as also of beat constable to Kajal and her in laws. Beat constable will visit them twice a day for next 30 days or such period as may be deemed appropriate by the concerned SHO.
The petitioner will not interfere or disturb the day-to-day life of Kajal
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saroj
- respondent
State & Ors.
Coram
G.S.Sistani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court