This order disposed of two applications. It exempted the petitioner and disposed of an application citing delay.
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~SB-1
ALL INDIA CPWD KARAMCHARI SANGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Naresh Kaushik and Ms.Kirtika Sharma, Advs.
versus
D.G.OF WORKS CPWD & ORS. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC, and Mr.Shambhu Chaturvedi, Adv. for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 26.05.2017
CM APPL. 19899/2017
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CM APPL. 19703/2017 (105 days delay)
Notice. Mr.Kaushik, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the non-
applicant/petitioner.
List on 21.7.2017.
G.S.SISTANI, J
VINOD GOEL, J
MAY 26, 2017 msr /
ALL INDIA CPWD KARAMCHARI SANGH
D.G. OF WORKS CPWD
G.S. SISTANI
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
