Dismissed
Razia v. State & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/2805/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAZIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.M.T. Malik, Adv. versus
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) and Mr.Tushar Sannu, Adv. for the State
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 07.12.2016
Husband of the petitioner is missing since 2014. The petitioner had filed a complaint against her husband under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, based on the complaint an FIR has been registered. Mr. Mehra submits that since the husband of the petitioner is not appearing, proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. have been completed and he has been declared as an absconder on 14th September, 2016. Additionally it is submitted that the IO would inform the petitioner every six weeks about the progress in the search of the husband of the petitioner. Based on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that
the matter may be disposed of.
The petition is accordingly disposed of.
In case the petitioner is not satisfied with the steps taken by the State, leave is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court again. Dasti.
G.S.SISTANI, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
DECEMBER 07, 2016/jitender
Razia
State
G.S. Sistani
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court