Disposed
Gajraj Singh v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/3019/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order corrects an inadvertent clerical error in a previous judgment dated 11.01.2016 where the name of the Bench was incorrectly mentioned. The court ordered the correction of the name.
What did the court decide?
Correction of the Bench name in the order dated 11.01.2016.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~32
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 3019/2015
¶4
GAJRAJ SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Manish K Chaudhary, Advocate
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC SI Anand Kumar, PS Mehrauli
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R
¶9
% 08.02.2016
¶10
- 1 . This file is taken up on office note.
¶11
- Due to inadvertence, in the order dated 11.01.2016, in the CORAM, the name of the Bench has been mentioned as Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.S. Teji instead of Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.P. Garg.
¶12
- The necessary correction be made in the order and it shall be read
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Gajraj Singh
- respondent
State & Anr
Coram
AI extract
S.P. Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court