The petitioner filed a writ petition. Pending settlement of Rs.40,000/- before the Court by the respondent, the petition was disposed of with the note that nothing survives in view of the settlement.
Petition disposed of on settlement of Rs.40,000/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5526/2011 SUMER CHAND ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person versus DY. LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL DISTT. AND ORS.. Respondents Through: Mr Ravjyot Singh, Adv. for R5 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA O R D E R % 06.01.2016
Pursuant to the settlement arrived at between the parties before Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre, the balance amount of Rs.40,000/- is being paid today in the Court by way of demand draft to the petitioner, who is present in person, by counsel for the respondent no.5. The photocopy of demand draft and identity card of petitioner is placed on record.
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, nothing survives in this petition and the same stands disposed of accordingly.
SUNITA GUPTA, J
JANUARY 06, 2016/ rd
Sumer Chand
DY. Labour Commissioner, Central Distt.
Sunita Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
