Dismissed
Pritpal Singh v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/2956/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought leave under Order XXXIX Rule 2 CPC to withdraw W.P.(CRL) 2956/2016 and Crl.M.A.15803/2016. Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive proposition of law.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~4
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 2956/2016 & Crl.M.A.15803/2016 PRITPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Manoj Yadav, Adv. versus
¶4
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with SI Sandeep Kumar PS Palam Village. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 01.12.2016
¶5
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
¶6
Disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous application is disposed of
¶7
as withdrawn.
¶8
A.K. PATHAK, J.
¶9
DECEMBER 01, 2016/ dk
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Pritpal Singh
- respondent
State & Anr.
Coram
AI extract
A.K. Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court