UOI v. Raja Shaikh & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses a criminal leave petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to file fresh and correct addresses of respondents despite prior court directions issued in orders dated 05-09-2014 and 26-07-2016.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.L.P. 23/2011
UOI ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. Pramod Bahuguna and Ms. Kavita, Advs. with Mr. Pawan Kumar, Air Custom Officer versus RAJA SHAIKH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 29.11.2016
Vide order dated 5th September, 2014 petitioner was directed to serve the respondents on taking steps including filing of fresh and correct address. Fresh and correct address has not been filed till date. Vide order dated 26th July, 2016 fresh notice was directed to be issued to the respondent nos. 1 and 2, returnable for today, subject to petitioner taking steps including filing of fresh and correct addresses of respondent nos. 1 and 2. Steps have not been taken. Fresh and correct addresses of the respondent nos. 1 and 2 have not been filed. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
NOVEMBER 29, 2016/ rb
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
UOI
- respondent
RAJA SHAIKH & ORS.
Coram
A.K. Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court