Disposed
Smt Punita Bhardwaj & Anr. v. Commissioner of Police & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/2406/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
SMT PUNITA BHARDWAJ & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K.Singla, Advocate
versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with SI Bhagat Ram, EOW, Mandir Marg. Mr. Rajeev Kapoor, Advocate for R2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
%
O R D E R 14.12.2016
Ms. Kapoor, on instructions from SI Bhagat Ram states that State is not proceeding in the matter against the petitioner. Respondent No.2 states that his complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. has been dismissed and his complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. is being processed, which he shall pursue.
In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner need not respond to the notice dated 27.07.2016. The petition stands disposed of.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DECEMBER 14, 2016 sl
SMT PUNITA BHARDWAJ & ANR
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court