The petitioner stated that disputes were resolved and does not wish to pursue the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRITI
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Satendra Kumar, Advocate
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Mr. Ananya Mohan, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R
%
09.12.2016
The petitioner is present in court with her counsel. She states that the since the disputes have been resolved with the family members, she does not wish to pursue this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DECEMBER 09, 2016
sr
PRITI
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
