During a hearing on Bail Appln. 1671/2016 preferred by Smt Sosan Masih, the court adjourned the matter, declared the current date a holiday, and dismissed the application by relying on the reasoning already adopted in a separate order dismissing an earlier bail application filed by the petitioner's husband.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40.
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP Mr. Antony R Julian, Adv for complainant
STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R % 14.12.2016
The matter is listed today as 12.12.2016 was declared a holiday. By a separate detailed order of even date, I have dismissed the bail application preferred by the petitioner’s husband being Bail Appln. 815/2016. For the same reasons, the present application is also dismissed.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DECEMBER 14, 2016 sr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application by Smt Sosan Masih ought to be dismissed given that the same was decided against the petitioner's husband in Bail Appln. 815/2016?
SMT SOSAN MASIH
STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI)
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
