The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VIKRAMSHILA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv.
versus
M VENKATESH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 03.02.2016
CM No.4028/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CONT.CAS(C) 98/2016
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
FEBRUARY 03, 2016 ak
VIKRAMSHILA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY
M VENKATESH & ORS
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
