Petitioner withdrew the present petition after filing a status report submitted by the respondent's counsel. The Court disposed of the petition and discharged the notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KAVITA DEVI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anilendra Pandey, Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Mr. D.P. Mohanty, Advs.
versus
VIJAY PAL SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, ASC for GNCTD along with Mr. R.A. Sanjeev, DCW, South West District and Mr. Satyavir, Inspector/SHO, PS Bindapur
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R
% 02.02.2016 1. Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, learned Additional Standing Counsel is present in Court along with DCP, South West and Inspector/SHO, PS Bindapur in terms of order dated 29th January, 2016.
have been called to the police station on 1st February, 2016 and they have been given stern warnings. It is further submitted that there is no specific threat perception at present. However, security shall be provided to the petitioner as and when found necessary. The DCP present in Court assures to personally monitor this matter and the petitioner is at liberty to contact him directly.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
FEBRUARY 02, 2016 dk
KAVITA DEVI
VIJAY PAL SINGH
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
