Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the respondent's reply sent in compliance with the impugned order.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the response dated 14.1.2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JAG BHUSHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Subhash Chander, Adv. versus
PROF TARUN KUMAR DASS ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Seema Dolo, Adv. for Delhi University.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R
% 01.02.2016
Vide order dated 28th September, 2015 in W.P.(C) 9248/2015, the Court directed the respondent to send the response to the petitioner’s legal notice dated 13th May, 2015 within a period of eight weeks and communicate the same to the petitioner within two weeks thereafter.
Vide letter dated 14th January, 2016, the respondent sent the response to the petitioner in terms of the order dated 28th September, 2015. The order dated 28th September, 2015 therefore stands complied. Learned counsel for the respondent has handed over the copy of the reply dated 14th January, 2016 which is taken on record. Copy of the same is handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the response dated 14th January, 2016.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
FEBRUARY 01, 2016/ dk
Jag Bhushan
Prof Tarun Kumar Dass
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
