The petitioner submitted that shops were de-sealed by the competent authority and thus withdrew the petitions. The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
5-^
versus
DR PXJNEET KUMAR GOEL Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Mr. Kunal Gosain, Advs. for SDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
ORDER
% 14.01.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the shops in question have been de-sealed by the competent authority on 11 December, 2015. Compliance report has been filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not press these petitions in view of the de-sealing of the shops in question.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 14, 2016
dk
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
DR PXJNEET KUMAR GOEL
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
